Deconstructing the CDC’s Position on Vaccinating COVID-Recovered Persons

This article will systematically appraise the statements and arguments made in the “Brief”. What should become apparent is the intellectual acrobatics (or unfortunate ineptitude) the CDC authors go through to evade the external and mounting clinical evidence in favor of natural immunity. Tactics include selective presentation of data from particular studies, omission of countervailing data from the same studies, outright omission of germane studies entirely, logically fallacious comparisons, and misapplication of studies to the pertinent questions. Finally, they contradict themselves across various sections of the brief, perhaps hoping the reader will simply forget what they read earlier.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *